The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was not followed up on. -- SatyrTN(talk | contribs) 17:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I am nominating this article for review because the defense of section is problematic in several ways:
it has NPOV issues
it does not explain the reasoning, references, or thinkers who defend heteronormativity
it requires prior knowledge about a celebrity "scandal" in order to be understood
it does not engage the material in an academic manner, which is important, being that heteronormativity is an academic construct
it does not cite appropriate sources
In addition, the section is poorly written. Jmsast 20:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Your nomination appears to imply you will not be working on the article. Do you yourself intend to address concerns, or someone on the article? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)