Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assess

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article assessment for Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga.

Articles up to and including B class on the assessment scale, you can assess on your own. For featured content and good articles there are established procedures central for Wikipedia. This page is for discussion about A-Class assessment for anime and manga related articles.

Contents 1 A Class criteria 2 Articles 2.1 Karas

[edit] A Class criteria

The assessment process works by discussion, but is less formal than Good Article or Featured Article promotion. Using the criteria below, an editor that is not a major contributor to the article in question may tag any article as A-Class on his or her own discretion. If another editor disagrees with the assessment, the article can be demoted without a formal review process. If the editors disagree, consensus should be sought with other editors.

From the assessment scale: Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class.

Article progress grading scheme

Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
A {{A-Class}}	Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.	Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage.	Durian (as of June 2006)

[edit] Articles

Articles under assessment or recently assessed as A or removed from A-Class. Older discussions are found in the archives.

[edit] Karas

I have rewritten the whole article, and desire comments and assessment of what improvements could be done. Jappalang (talk) 08:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)