User talk:Wikipeterproject

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

FYI - I've been working hard on a biography page you marked for cleanup: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Pike

thanks for the start!

--RFlynn1000 17:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

1 Image:Steve_gumley.jpg
2 Image:George_Pell_Official_Publicity_Photo.jpg
3 Fender_Bullet_(1982).jpg
4 Stephen Gumley
5 Peer Review
6 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dmo.gif
7 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sandra Prinsloo.jpg
8 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Department of defence.gif
9 Des mueller
10 DMO additions
11 Gumley = 3.5 stars?

[edit] Image:Steve_gumley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Steve_gumley.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:George_Pell_Official_Publicity_Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:George_Pell_Official_Publicity_Photo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

[edit] Fender_Bullet_(1982).jpg

I have tagged Image:Fender_Bullet_(1982).jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page.

ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 20:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stephen Gumley

Hello there. Hope you don't mind that I have reverted your edit of 26 May as the full title of the professional association which links to Engineers Australia is The Institution of Engineers - Australia. cheers Geoffrey Wickham 00:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peer Review

I have peer reviewed James Killen. You can find the comments at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Peer review/James Killen. Giggy _U^CP 04:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dmo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Dmo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sandra Prinsloo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sandra Prinsloo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Department of defence.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Department of defence.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Des mueller

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Des mueller, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.saxton.com.au/default.asp?sd8=2261. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DMO additions

Thanks for that. I came home with a pile of Org Charts; you've saved me the effort. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gumley = 3.5 stars?

By whom is Gumley Considered a "three-and-a-half star"? i.e. Have you a reference to support this?
Maybe you could have argued that when he was "Undersecretary", but now that he's CEO, he's a 3 star. Yes, he does have 3 stars (or more precisely, SES level 3) reporting to him, but that's not an unusual situation - the CIO has been a 2 star, and had 2 stars reporting to him, until the relatively recent appointment of Farr. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)