User talk:Wikifreak99

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

• Wikifreak99 (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • • [http://en.wikipedia.org../../../../articles/i/p/b/Special%7EIpblocklist_2536.html unblock)
• 71.184.197.204 (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • ipblocklist • rangeblocks • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock)
• Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "J-melz". The reason given for J-melz's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

• Blocking admin: AzaToth (talk • autoblocks • blocks)

• Decline reason:

You are directly blocked. This account is a sock of J-melz. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 18:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Exact Quote from wikipedia rulebook "the principle "Ignorantia juris non excusat" (Latin for: "ignorance of the law does not excuse") is incompatible with the policies of not biting and assuming good faith. If you prosecute and judge people because they are ignorant of our policies and guidelines, you are in fact violating our policies and guidelines!" my other account j-melz was dissallowed from stating my freedom speech therefor i am forced to state my opinions on this account, it is unfair that i was banned due to my ignorance of wikipedia policies"

Decline reason: "You weren't blocked for being ignorant of policy. As you amassed numerous warnings with your other account for willfully violating policy, you created this second account to continue anew. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 19:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "yes now that i know the rules of wikipedia i plan on creating and editing pages productively, i promise not to vandalize any other pages in the future, please unblock account j-melz as well if u do decide to unblock this account thank you"

Decline reason: "Account clearly abusive. — Yamla 19:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "And actually the only warnings i amassed were due to my ignorance of how to dispute a delted page, i beleive you are mistaken, i was never given a vandalism warning, thank you for your time"

Decline reason: "Unblock abuse. --Yamla 19:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.