User talk:Wikidsp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Monad (category theory)
Hello, I noticed your edit on Monad (category theory), and I'm sorry to hear that you've not found a satisfactory route into that work. If you want to understand monads in functional programming from the mathematical perspective, you could start with the "notions of computation" articles by Eugenio Moggi, and the subsequent work of Phil Wadler. (Contrary to your assertion, it is very rigorous.) Sam Staton (talk) 11:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Howdy. To insert an opinion into the article Monad (category theory), it is not sufficient that you be an expert with an opinion. The neutral point of view policy requires that we attribute that opinion to somebody. "Some mathematicians are not convinced" is weaselly, since it does not say which mathematicians are not convinced. If you have published your claim in a reliable source, or if someone else has published essentially the same claim, then by all means add it with an appropriate reference. Michael Slone (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Wikidsp,
All the above things apply if You want to insert things into the body of the article itself. But You can add Your concerns also to the talk page of the article (Talk:Monad (category theory)). In this case, the problems will be discussed by the other editors, and the argumentations can be expressed in details. You can express also personal feelings on the talk page.
As for me, I learnt about monads while learning Haskell programming language. You can see their homepage, there are materials about monads. I have not yet grasped all about monads from the theoretical side, but I can used them at my job.
Best wishes,
