Category talk:Wikipedians against notability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Reasons to oppose the notability doctrine

  1. It is interpreted as policy on AfD when it's just some essay. -- Chris Ccool2ax contrib.
  2. Wiki is not paper. Nuff said. However, this is also an issue for the Inclusionists. - Smeelgova 08:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Project

  • If you all started a Wikipedia:WikiProject, that explained your reasoning and such a little better, more people would probably think of joining. As it stands, your current position and specifics are not easily understood. Just how much "notability" are you against? Is there a minimum level still required? These would all be interesting issues to delve into with a Wikipedia:WikiProject. It will be interesting to see how this discussion page and issue develops over time. Yours, Smeelgova 08:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Renaming the category

  • This category should be renamed to something like: Wikipedians who think notability is not a popularity contest but an issue of verifiability. Yours, Smeelgova 23:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC).
Or even just simply: Wikipedians who think notability is not a popularity contest. Yours, Smeelgova 23:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC).
User categories for discussion This category was nominated for deletion or renaming on December 20, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. The discussion may also be here.

[edit] Category in the category

Is it normal for this category to be in the same category? It makes a category tree go on branching ad infinitum in itself... -- Mentifisto 04:26, 26 December 2007 (UTC) :I don't think it is, I've removed the catagory from itself. Guest9999 (talk) 14:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Stike that, messed up the removal. Guest9999 (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)