Template talk:Whydelete
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This template was nominated for deletion at WP:TFD. The decision was to keep:
- Barely in use, but more importantly this doesn't seem like a very useful application for templates. Radiant_* 09:44, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Hrm. I'm certain I've seen this wording before, and not on any of the talk pages where it's currently instanced. Standard practice might well be to subst it in, since leaving it as a template might be seen as an affront to the user. —Korath (Talk) 10:36, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete -- Netoholic @ 18:41, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm probably the only person using this (since I didn't publicize it at all); usually I "subst" it just on general principle. But it's useful for bringing WP:CSD to the attention of editors who have improperly listed things for sppedy deletion. It seems more polite than just reverting a speedy nomination without comment. It hasn't been used recently because I haven't been doing CAT:CSD duty much recently. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 18:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I think that it should have more detail, but 'bad' content is never a reason for deleting something. Keep this template, just like we keep other messages like Template:Test, Template:Test2, etc. -Frazzydee|✍ 18:09, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
