Talk:Wholphin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Cetaceans
This article is part of WikiProject Cetaceans, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use cetaceans resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance within WikiProject Cetaceans.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaiʻi, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Hawaiʻi. Please participate by editing the article Wholphin, or visit the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a brief summary at comments to explain the ratings.)

[edit] What was the other parent of Kekaimalu's offspring?

The wolphin's calves would have been either 3/4 bottlenose and 1/4 FKW or 3/4 FKW and 1/4 bottlenose depending on what she mated with. I'm surprised the article doesn't say which. 4.89.245.204 03:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

The MSNBC article referenced says it was a bottlenose. I've added this to the article. Rojomoke 14:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

The article mentions there are two wolphins in captivity, but as I understand it, the daughter of the first one wouldn't be a wolphin, it'd be a wolphinphin, or something. The article in general is a bit confusing overall- it took me at least three tries to understand the paragraph about "Kekaimalu" and offspring, though this might be because of the late hour. In any case, I do think that section needs a bit untangling. -- Sarrandúin [ Talk + Contribs ] 06:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spelling

I rather think we mean 'wholphin', not 'wolphin'. The father being a whale, not a wale (UNLESS - Jimbo was the father?!?). The raw numbers tell the same tale: wolphin vs wholphin.

-- Tom Anderson 2007-04-25 16:31 +0100

Agreed, 'wholphin' is six-fold more common on the web, plus it's used by all the external links currently cited. I'll make the change now. –Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 14:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
ps Tom I notice you've made some really worthwhile contributions here (eg); have you thought about creating an account?
The problem with using "wholphin" is that, it implies that if you don't have the whine-wine merger, you would use the wh sound. However, this never actually occurs before o; it's merged with 'h'. Consider "who" and "whore" etc. Still, if it's more common... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.103.66 (talk) 11:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Move?

In light of the above, presumably this page should now be moved to Wholphin. Any objections? Otherwise I'll move it and fix any redirects early next week. –Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 14:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)