Talk:Who Really Cares (Featuring the Sound of Insanity)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Who Really Cares (Featuring the Sound of Insanity) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Who Really Cares (Featuring the Sound of Insanity) has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	Who Really Cares (Featuring the Sound of Insanity) is part of the "Dream Days at the Hotel Existence" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on March 1, 2008.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 25, 2008 Good article nominee Listed May 8, 2008 Featured topic candidate Promoted Current Status: Good article

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Powderfinger (Rated GA-Class) Powderfinger Portal Who Really Cares (Featuring the Sound of Insanity) falls within the scope of the Powderfinger WikiProject, an effort by Wikipedians to improve articles on the band, its songs, albums, and members (as well as their side projects). For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article is on a subject of mid priority within the project WikiProject Powderfinger Quick Tasks: edit  Create: "Automatic (Powderfinger song)" Expand: Steven Bishop, Powderfinger's Oi Song Trilogy Bring to GA: Tea & Sympathy, Far Out Corporation, The Predators (band) WikiProject Australia      (Rated GA-Class) Portal Who Really Cares (Featuring the Sound of Insanity) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Songs (Rated GA-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Alternative music WikiProject     (Rated GA-Class) Alternative music Portal This article is part of the Alternative music WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.

[edit] GA review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is in decent shape, but it needs a little work before it becomes a Good Article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   In the Release - Music video section, "in contrast to the studio recorded radio edit released as a digital single", what does that mean? "The music video is directly the performance featured on the DVD for the Across the Great Divide tour...", wouldn't it be best to re-write the sentence to "The music video comes directly from the featured performance of the Across the Great Divide tour DVD". If not, then it was a suggestion pitch. Is "Glasgow" a recording label? If not, what exactly is it linking to? New section, Critical responses, shouldn't "TheScene.com.au", "CitySearch Sydney" and "Fastlouder" be italicized? Can a little more information be added to the Track listing section? If not, I will not make it a big deal to the review.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Wouldn't YouTube violate source policy, per here?

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Does Reference 6 cover all the info. about the music video? In the charts section, "The song's critical response has been mostly positive, though so too were the two prior singles from Dream Days at the Hotel Existence, which both performed poorly in the charts" and "Like these two, "Who Really Cares" was released to radioplay and music video stations, but with little inclusion in circulation, leading speculators to believe the single will follow "I Don't Remember" and "Nobody Sees" with poor charting performance", need a source to back that up.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Without going into OR, there's not a lot more that can be said of the track listing, because nobody's reviewed the single as a single, nor the music video. As to YouTube, it can be used as a source, if it's an officially released video, and the purpose of using YouTube is to link to the actual video, not a collection of arbitrary information. I'll see if I can address all of your concerns asap. I think I'll need the full week though. I'm pretty busy. --rm 'w avu 14:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

That's alright, if info. can't be brought about the song, then that's fine. As for the YouTube stuff, I was asking it if violates policy or not. The full week it is. Good luck with the article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Responses to prose stuff.

• I removed the first phrase you quoted; it's not relevant to the video.
• 2nd quote reworded.
• Glasgow is a location, removed as not really adding much.
• Put a new section in.
• No, no italics as they're not magazines/newspapers, they're websites (see WP:ITALICS).
• That's all the track listing there is...:)

dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 11:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you to everyone who got the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats to everyone. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)