User:White Cat/Adminship survey summary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 Feel free to join the discussion on the future of Requests for adminship process at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Reform. Everyone's comments are welcome!
RFA is a danger of death, a lot of people have started to keep away from RFA
RFA is a danger of death, a lot of people have started to keep away from RFA

Contents

[edit] Admin actions

[edit] Actions per admin

[edit] Blocks/unblocks per day

[edit] Deletes/restores per day

[edit] Protect/unprotect per day

[edit] En admin vs user growth

[edit] En admin vs article growth

[edit] RfA rates

[edit] Success Rate RfA - 2006

[edit] Votes Per RfA - 2006

[edit] Average Edit Countat - RfA-2006

[edit] En admin growth

[edit] Wikipedia:Adminship survey

[edit] Requests for Adminship (RfA)

[edit] Existing administrators

[edit] Miscellaneous

  1. (06/23/03) I agree with trial adminship in principle
    • Yes
    • No
    • Other
  2. (11/06/23/03/02) Adminship recall should be extended to all admins
    • Agree
    • Agree, but only with sufficient suffrage level to keep the trolls out
    • Disagree
    • Other
    • Comment/Question
  3. (29/03/09) IRC should not be used in making admin decisions
    • Agree
    • Disagree
    • Other
  4. (19/05/07) Admins should be sanctioned on-wiki for their incivility/attacks on IRC
    • Agree
    • Disagree
    • Other
  5. (06/11/02/05/05) The community should have direct say in IRC operator/Oversight/CheckUser access
    • Agree
    • Agree to IRC, disagree to oversight/checkuser
    • Agree to oversight/checkuser, disagree to IRC
    • Disagree
    • Other
  6. (06/11/04) This poll has too many questions
    • Agree
    • Disagree
    • Other

[edit] External links