Talk:Whitehouse.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
AW HAILL YEA
According to the article, whitehouse.com is "#1 Internet adult site". Where do those statistics come from? Eurleif 08:52, Jan 8, 2004 (UTC)
Any particular reason why the table of contents is on the right in this article? It seems a bit inconsistent with the Wikipedia aesthetic. Also, the current website at WAPAAAAHH.com appears to be a non-government entity that offers government statistical data. Could someone who knows more about this site add a description to the Current Status section? --LostLeviathan 06:57, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
It seems like whoever owns the domain now can't seem to make up his/her/their mind about what to do with it; it's had a bewildering array of different uses over the last year or so. Maybe they're just trying everything they can think of until they find something they can make money on (but porn was the only thing that actually succeeded). *Dan T.* 11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] the controversy section
I'm a bit unsatisfied with the controversy section, at least the parts that are explaining the .gov versus .com issue. It's factually correct, but not too exact.
- -
Uh -- "much less obscene"? Isn't obscenity a specific legal term? I suspect the author meant something like "less sexually explicit."
[edit] PC world article
This is currently linked to from PC World's 25 worst websites just so you are all aware.Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 16:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

