User talk:Wflynn12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I submitted an article - "Free Online Credit Reports" your editors because of the title ASSUMED it was spam - none even read it! The article explains how to contact the credit reporting agencies and government agencies to recieve your credit reports - no website is referenced at all that could be considered spam?! The only thing I can think of is that they confused AnnualCreditReport.com to be spam but that is the website created by the 3 reporting agencies as a central place to request credit reports! Look at this link https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/helpabout or even contact the reporting agencies themselves that is where you MUST go to requst a free credit report from them which is allowed once a year. I own USLister.com and you can see a copy of the article there at http://www.uslister.com/realty/resources/free-online-credit-reports.html and this information was purely informational and helpfull and spam free. I am now blocked as spammer what can I do? At least tell me where you think I spammed as I am at a loss.

William Flynn

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "REASON"

Decline reason: "Your actions were against the basic rules and the fundamental nature of the project. You consistently recreated deleted content. You were probably blocked as a spammer because this smacks of self-promotion. — Vassyana 18:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Where were these smacks of self-promotion? The report made no mention of my website just the reporting agencies and government agencies needed to get a free credit report. As far as resubmitting I did this figuring someone would actually read the article before wrongly assuming spam but apparently they all just read the title and assumed it was spam as you did. I will not post on wikipedia anymore as I feel your editors are not doing a good job sorting out the spam. Everytime I challenge someone to point out the source of spam in this article they avoid answering this question. Everytime?