Talk:Weyauwega derailment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Weyauwega derailment was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Delisted version: April 23, 2007
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Wisconsin. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
If you give this article a rating or change a previous rating, please leave a short summary in the comments to explain the rating and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Trains Portal
Sel week 24, 2007
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.


To-do
list

Pending tasks for Weyauwega derailment:

 (purge cache –  edit this list)
  • Add images: photos of the accident scene and/or cleanup, diagram of the accident, etc.
  • Expand the lead section
  • Expand the details on the cleanup and the consequences/lessons learned from the accident
See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Todo

Contents

[edit] Cause?

I didn't see any info on the cause or probably cause of this accident. Most train accident articles include that. --68.49.236.45 14:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC) (Greg)

Doh! I'll add that in a moment... Slambo (Speak) 15:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article Review

This article is currently at Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 01:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA delisted

This article was delisted per the archived Good article review and the instructions at said archive. IvoShandor 11:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)