Talk:Wentworth Woodhouse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Wentworth Woodhouse is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's assessment scale. See comments for details. |
|
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-Priority on the Project's priority scale. | |
Lots of unsubstantiated claims of 'class war spite' on the part of the government - this violates NPOV and is most likely complete garbage.
- Not true. It is referenced and correct. --Counter-revolutionary 19:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- The assertions in the main article are correctly referenced from Catherine Bailey's recent book and the Sunday Times article. Read them if you don't believe it! --BaseTurnComplete 11:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, just because someone makes an assertion in print doesn't make that assertion true.
Exile 15:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- No it doesn't, however "unsubstatiated" and "a violation of NPOV" it is not: the assertions are correctly cited from two sources. Unless a citable reference to the contrary can be found, to assert otherwise in the main article is original research. BaseTurnComplete 22:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Good Article?
IMHO this is turning into a good article (lower case!) Maybe it should be nominated as a Good Article? BaseTurnComplete (talk) 10:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, please don't put it through that! a good article is simply a good article: it doesn't need to be vetted by some incompetent panel of teeners. There are many ways to spend time at Wikipedia: that's unlikely to be a fruitful one. --Wetman (talk) 05:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
wow I like staff like that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.250.197 (talk) 12:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
