Talk:Wellington, Shropshire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject UK geography      (Rated Start-Class) This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements. United Kingdom Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments) Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance within the UK geography WikiProject. WikiProject Cities     (Rated Start-Class) This article is supported by WikiProject Cities, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to cities, towns, and various other settlements on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the priority scale.

There need to be sources given for the claim regarding the location of the house were King Charles I stayed.

Also for the claims regarding Chatenay-Malabry.

---

If your French is up to scratch you can see source for the twinning here otherwise a translated verison is here.

Bigdaddymerk 13:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC))

It's on the signs going into the town. Enough proof really. 81.79.151.168 14:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merger with Telford section

This section is totally unsourced and has been tagged [citation needed] since July 2007. Instead of the tag being removed, a source better than "some people say" is required. See also WP:AWT. If, indeed, the merger is opposed by a significant number of people, there should be newspaper articles or opinion polls that can be cited. If not, then the section doesn't belong. I've retagged this section accordingly. JGHowes ^talk - 22:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I would be inclined to agree that the content as it stands may not be appropriate. I have additonally tagged it as unbalanced, as it neglects to mention anything positive about the merge with Telford. Mouchoir le Souris (talk) 21:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)