Talk:Weaver stance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The picture in the article is about isosceles, not weaver. This page has proper pictures for both: http://www.io.com/~cortese/firearms/index.html
Actually the stance is Isosceles but hold is not. Isosceles needs locked arms, as we can c from the link, but soldiers arms in the picture are bent. This hold looks more mixed Turret and Isosceles.
If the stance on the picture is Isosceles and the arms are what-ever, the picture doesn't belong to an article about the Weaver stance. I'll delete it. --Thosch66 19:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

