Talk:Weather balloon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Weather balloon article.

Article policies
This article related to weather data or instruments is part of the Weather Data and Instrumentation sub-project of WikiProject Meteorology and Weather Events, an attempt to standardize and improve all articles related to weather or meteorology. You can help! Visit the project page or discuss an article at its talk page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance within WikiProject Meteorology.

[edit] Helium vs. Hydrogen

RE: "...rarely hydrogen...", as I recall, the US NWS changed from heliuim to hydrogen about 25 years ago. Have they changed back? Rsduhamel 01:57, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

An email this morning from Bill Blackmore of the US NWS says that about 1/3 of their stations use helium and the rest use hydrogen.CambridgeBayWeather 15:14, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
I was trained using helium in the early 1990s by both the USAF and Metropolitan State College of Denver. 147.145.40.43 00:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Safety risks?

For the lay reader, this page should also address the possible safety risks caused by the falling instrument packages when the balloons disintegrate - or is there some kind of parachute mechanism to restrict the falling speed?

In this respect, the appr. size and weight of the instrument package would also be of interest to the lay reader. -Typofier 09:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)