User talk:Wayniac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Wayniac, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  HGB 08:32, 6 November 2005 (UTC)


[edit] FYI: Definition of vandalism

Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the encyclopedia.

[edit] You're still confused about how wikipedia works

Why did you remove the request for a citation? (Click here) Is it because you cannot come up with one, thereby quashing the weak evidence you base you assertions on? If you had at least skimmed over the wikipedia guidelines, you'd find that all perceived spurious claims ideally should be accompanied by the citation of a reliable outside source, in order to maintain the integrity of the article in which the statement subsists. Any removal of the request of such a request, is effectively a deletion that reduces the quality of the encyclopedic nature of the article. With your act, what you have done is almost consistent with the above definition: vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the encyclopedia.

Stopping short of labeling you as a "vandal", as I'm sure it wasn't deliberate attempt (misguided, at best) once again, I implore you to furnish the guidelines once more. Also I request again that you click on the vandalism link and read it, because from the reasonings behind your reverting, you appear to be confused as to what constitutes said "vandalism".

Thank you.

I love the irony of an unsigned, random member offering me advice... :) --Wayniac 19:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments to anon user

You have made some valid points in your comments to 203.214.89.155. However, given that he is somewhat combative in spirit right now, I would suggest you not hook with him. By that I mean, if you react to some of the things he says, it could escalate. Oh yes, and here's a visual of that (which includes the troll in all of us):

-- Please don't feed the trolls!

Sunray 19:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Sunray, I will take your comments on board. --Wayniac 19:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)