Talk:Waterberry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] POV

This article reads like a brochure - even if Waterberry is notable enough to belong in an encyclopedia, the article should be scaled back to be much more neutral. The fact that a founder of the organization wrote the bulk of the article is a bit troublesome ... johndburger 03:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright

The material on this page appears to be taken verbatim from a page on the Waterberry web site [1]. However, since members of the company appear to have authored this Wikipedia article, they presumably have the right to post the material on Wikipedia. They should be aware that in doing so they are releasing the material under the GNU Free Documentation License. johndburger 11:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Response to Copyright and Neutrality concerns

The material on Waterberry Development Organisation was indeed written by a founder of the organisation. We are a not-for-profit organisation that caters to young professionals throughout the world and have therefore tried to use simple, clear and neutral language throughout. The text was taken from the waterberry website, and we are fully aware that we are releasing the material under the GNU Free Documentation License. carlbjorkman 11:50, 05 January 2007