Talk:Washington College of Law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Should Carla Martin really be considered prominent? She's a disgrace, for sure, but I'd rather list her as "infamous" or something.
- I don't see her mentioned in the article; you think she should be?
Wow, I figured that I would have noticed Nader while going to Law School here..... I'd put down that this place is the looney left Berkley of the east coast, but that would get the pov nazis down on me, eh?
- Hey, then why don't you transfer to Regent like Monica Goodling? not too many liberal intellectuals there.
- kinda hard after I gave them the 100,000k and graduated, ain't it?
[edit] Former Site of Apex Theater
This law school stands on the site of the old Apex Theater, a majestic art-deco movie palace built in the 1920s. A spirited campaign was waged to save it, but it went the way of the wrecker's ball in the 1980s.
[edit] Infobox
i think the 'law school' infobox template is more appropriate here, rather than the 'university' infobox being used.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WashingtonCollegeofLaw.png
Image:WashingtonCollegeofLaw.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

