User talk:War wizard90

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Days of 47 logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Days of 47 logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Parade-cat-float.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parade-cat-float.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Days_of_47_parade_band.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Days_of_47_parade_band.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Parade-cat-float47.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parade-cat-float47.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Drum corps

Glad to see you're really throwing yourself into working on the drum corps activity! However, I do have a couple of concerns. First, notability of drum corps. Wikipedia has notability guidelines on a lot of subjects, Wikipedia:Notability (music) and the proposed Wikipedia:Notability (organizations). All items in the list should be notable, which might mean some corps can't cut it as they aren't verifiable. We then have the problem of trying to figure out which corps can be verified and can't, a simply mammoth task. Secondly, following this, there's almost no information on some corps. If you're using corpsreps for your guide (which I assume you are at least in part) there are many defunct corps with no corps history, no current website, and no information to write a Wiki article on except for their repertoires and location. Finally, and this one is a nitpick, I think the Drum Corps Wikiproject agreed, at least for now, that the naming convention for articles is "XXX Drum and Bugle Corps." The current list currently links to articles that may share a name with a corps but aren't corps themselves. I hope you'll reply either here or on my user page, I'd like to talk with you about this further. Mr Bound 01:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please cite sources

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tech N9ne, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Incorrect Notables?

Didn't you watch NBA back in November? On route to 52 points, kobe scored 11 fgs in a row. http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=261130013 --Twlighter 22:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Connect-A-Pedia

I see your point about the article, but it is well known and popular in Australia and I believe I was the first person to think of it in 2002 and was definitely the only one to file a patent ($1500) in 2003 which was just granted 2 days ago. But, I see where you're coming from and are not resentful of you, just the deletion policies, Thank You.

[edit] NASCAR

I just check the NASCAR site, and his sponsor is is 360 OTC. The only thing that has to do with WrestleMania is that 360 OTC is also the official sponsor of WrestleMania 23. TJ Spyke 21:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

You are correct and I apologize. I thought WWE was the NASCAR sponsor, not the event itself. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction to find the information. Bmg916 Speak to Me 16:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
It's okay, I understand. I'm constantly getting frustrated with users blatantly ignoring warnings in pro wrestling articles and continually find it hard to AGF, but somehow I do, no harm done. I have also let the other user now that you were right and pointed him to the specific site on the driver where it blatantly states Wrestlemania is a sponsor. Take care. Bmg916 Speak to Me 19:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
There has been some confusion on Michael Waltrip (or as you wrote "Michael Waltip [sic]"), and Ja7yski, according to his site, lists him at zero, and that has been confirmed by NASCAR. Additionally, he's still 27 points in the red. NoseNuggets 1:45 AM US EDT Mar 27 2007

[edit] IVANHOE (software) and other new pages by User:Nowviskie‎

If this software article deserves a db-tag, then there's a string of other pages that this user created that probably deserves the same treatment. I db-bio tagged this user's vanity article‎, but I wasn't sure about the rest of the list, so I left them alone. Thanks. Finngall 18:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

He was totally right to delete the empty article on my name (which I added before I understood how user pages worked), but I feel strongly that the stub articles describing software and academic initatives in my field should be left to stand so that others can expand on them. They are right in line with other articles I could name on academic software tools and initiatives. Please give me guidance on making these articles better, rather than just deleting them. Nowviskie


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Image:Jesus is Magic.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Image:Jesus is Magic.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hidden Stash III.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hidden Stash III.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:ArticCircle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ArticCircle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Joint Venture.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Joint Venture.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:High Society.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:High Society.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Carl_Edwards.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carl_Edwards.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ron Paul

I was certain I seen it on CNN (this morning), that Ron Paul dropped out. Oh well, I've been wrong before. GoodDay (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah ha! I see. GoodDay (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The Washington Post is reporting he's dropping out, today. GoodDay (talk) 17:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, it's only reporting the same Paul statements from last week. PS- I wish the congressman would be more clearer on what he's doing. This I'm sorta still running stuff, is very fuzzy. GoodDay (talk) 17:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)