From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Snooker |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Snooker, an attempt to improve Wikipedia's coverage of snooker. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| WikiProject Australia / Sports (Rated B-Class) |

Portal
|
Walter Lindrum is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. |
| B |
This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
|
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports. |
Assessment comments
The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit · history · watch · refresh)
[edit] Sources
Needs to be resourced so that the references are inline and specific facts cite them. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 00:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rating
I'm rating this article at B and think it has potential as a good article candidate. First, however, it needs inline citations, with page numbers cited for each reference or so. It also could use more than one reference if one could be found. It's a nice article. --Bookworm857158367 01:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, this seems like a borderline one. Mor einine citations and far better sentence structure would make this a potential GA. Yeah, a third opinion on this, lol. I would've rated it start but would've been fine with the B rating.--Wizardman 22:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
|
| WikiProject Biography (Rated B-Class) |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. |
|
|
| B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] |
|
|
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group. |
| More information about this article... |
|
|
|
The following comments have been left for this page:
[edit] Sources
Needs to be resourced so that the references are inline and specific facts cite them. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 00:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rating
I'm rating this article at B and think it has potential as a good article candidate. First, however, it needs inline citations, with page numbers cited for each reference or so. It also could use more than one reference if one could be found. It's a nice article. --Bookworm857158367 01:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, this seems like a borderline one. Mor einine citations and far better sentence structure would make this a potential GA. Yeah, a third opinion on this, lol. I would've rated it start but would've been fine with the B rating.--Wizardman 22:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC) (edit)
|
|
|
This article has an assessment summary page. |
Find sources: Walter Lindrum billiard – news, books, scholar
[edit] Assessment
I'm rating this article at B and think it has potential as a good article candidate. First, however, it needs inline citations, with page numbers cited for each reference or so. It also could use more than one reference if one could be found. It's a nice article. --Bookworm857158367 01:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I said something similar at /Comments here. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 01:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- I've added some citations and some other sources. - Nick C 18:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Verra nahce. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 02:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Good to see this article developing from my early contributions in starting the article. This person's achievements in his sport were outstanding.--Takver 00:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 1000+ breaks?
Is the part about "regularly making breaks of over 1000" a typo or were they using a different scoring system back then? In the latter case, an explanation would be nice. 62.178.87.193 08:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, and yes to an extent, respectively. In English billiards you can score by potting and/or by cannoning. Good point though. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 22:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)