Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Natasha Quam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:29, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Natasha Quam

Vanity page created by user with the same name. Non-notable. -- Ponder 10:30, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)

I just noticed that she created this page by moving her user page there. Would it be OK if I just moved it back to her user page? -- Ponder 10:42, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
Sounds good, be bold! --fvw* 10:48, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
  • Comment: The page was previously created within Template:Hh by User:Fiestylittlevixen (see her contributions), who'd apparently gotten confused by the template's "edit this template" link (which I've removed to prevent similar future mishaps). She's since sent me email apologizing for the move, and further stating that "Natasha Quam Is very well known and respected in the art, music, and fashion communities. Not only have her artistic works been exhibited at various galleries but she has dresses celebrities such as Sharon Stone, Donatella Versace, and even Martha Stewart." Myself, I note that "Natasha Quam" gets only 18 Google hits, none of them relevant. No vote from me though. —Korath会話 11:58, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Seems like this is going to be disputed, so let's vote. Delete (or move into User: space). --fvw* 15:18, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)

Duh-lete. 'Natasha Quam' is not notable in the art, music, and fashion communities, and this is a vanity page via user Fiestylittlevixen, who is probably Natasha Quam. Clear violation. The fact that she seems like a cute girl should, of course, make many voters go into a tizzy trying to be nice to her. I vote that we rename this project "NatashaQuamipedia." She is more important than anything else here, since she might be an attractive girl. Doy. Auto movil 17:50, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

    • Concur. With extreme prejudice. Edeans 06:03, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, blatant vanity and hoaxy too. Wyss 19:48, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, dear Lord delete. "Love is a moral issue" indeed. Icundell 00:21, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. DreamGuy 02:21, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.