Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jesus: the Christian POV

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 02:25, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jesus: the Christian POV

Another of the Jesus series created by User:I834 - virtually no information and nothing not at Jesus. We don't need multiple articles on the same topics from different POV - just one NPOV article. --G Rutter 20:16, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. We also have Jesus NPOV, which I'll also list. Dunc|☺ 20:18, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Rje 20:23, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: DCEdwards1966 21:02, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Jeltz talk 21:54, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete this stub of a duplicate article. Wyss 22:53, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. It sure seems like straight forks of existing articles should be speedy-deletable. I can't say that I can think of a single good reason for it. --BM 01:33, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Quill 01:42, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. DJ Clayworth 17:55, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this is already pretty much covered in the pre-existing Jesus article. Megan1967 03:01, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I would have voted Merge with Jesus if it was longer than one line of text, and I would have voted Keep if it was too long to merge with Jesus, longer than few sections. See also: VfD/Jesus: the Jewish POV. Rafał Pocztarski 04:10, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV fork. Jayjg | (Talk) 22:49, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.