Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Geozones

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 04:14, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Geozones

Original research, neologism. --Nike 03:39, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Original research: A proposed system. When arguing against the status quo, one must first offer a case for change, then offer a plan that will address the needs set forth in the case. Otherwise, it's a doodle. Geogre 04:17, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable (only a fraction of the 288 google hits were about this time system.) - Amgine 04:48, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable orginal research. Rje 14:07, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete as an ad for original research. No evidence of peer-review, etc. Wyss 23:25, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.