Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/2145

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Vacuum c 16:38, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 2145

An article by this name was deleted back in June. The contents of the new article are "the number that comes after 2144 if you count up." DCEdwards1966 00:01, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)

• Pure ridiculousness, possibly from a vandal bot. Speedy delete. - Lucky 6.9 00:05, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy. I almost laughed. Almost. JRM 00:06, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
• Delete. Well, it's NPOV, non-vanity and verifiable. But just not a very notable number. P Ingerson 00:36, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Probably vanity from the number concerned, I think it just wants to show off by being in an encyclopedia despite its lack of achievements. Seriously, if we let this in then we'll have an infinite number of other articles to create. Rje 01:18, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  It's no 0, that's all I'm saying. Does 2145 have a user page yet? We could leave a friendly reminder not to create vanity pages. Should someone else have enough material for an article, we will of course judge that on its own merits, and put in the link to Category:Wikipedians with article. JRM 01:28, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)

• Comment: Presumably created because someone clicked on a red link [1] Kappa 01:42, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. utcursch 10:32, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
• Redirect to 22nd century, like most of the individual years from that century (i.e., 2142) --Plutor 16:02, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Redirect to 22nd century as above. David Johnson [T|C] 17:00, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Not encyclopedic because it provides no useful information to anyone old enough to read the article. If I had seen it before the VfD listing I would have speedy-deleted it as a "very short article with little or no context." If anyone ever has anything meaningful to say about the number they can create a new article under this heading without prejudice. This is not a helpful start on an article about 2145, nor does it point out an important topic that we need an article on. Dpbsmith (talk) 19:00, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Merge anything useful into 143 and delete. It's a multiple of a notable prime, not notable in itself. iMeowbot~Mw 09:24, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete or rename 2145(number)
• Strong delete. I know that 2145 comes after 2144 if you count up. This example of patent nonsense is the sort of stuff I don't want to see on Wikipedia. Scott Gall 03:14, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.