User talk:VolkswagenKing28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome To My Talk Page. Please Complete My Math Quiz Below Before Sending Me A Message!


  • 1. 473,219 - 197,219 =
  • 2. 16,781,229 + 1,129,273 + 197,336 + 18,211 + 1,979 + 181 + 17 + 1 =
  • 3. 17,699 + 4,170 - 764 =
  • 4. 268,419 X 115 =
  • 5. 1,167,213,811 + 10,291,755 =
  • 6. 23,179,411 + 227,411 =
  • 7. 18,721,659 X 369 =
  • 8. 455,211 X 211 =
  • 9. 225,000 X 100 =
  • 10. 227,155 X 194 =

Could you please explain why you're adding protection templates to pages which aren't protected? Or these particular user pages? – Luna Santin (talk) 10:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Future

Hi VK. I'd like to echo the question above, and suggest you make some positive contributions in the very near future. Deiz talk 11:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Protection tag expiration

The Burger King article has been granted permanent, partial protection because of rampant vandalism that occurred each time the protection was removed. Could you please explain why you're adding expiration dates to protection templates on pages which are permanently protected?

Jerem43 21:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Patrol Car2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:PatrolCar2.jpg. The copy called Image:PatrolCar2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Template:Urvan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thewinchester (talk) 23:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Burger King. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Editing the protection template on this page and any other page was highly inappropriate, and regardless of this it had no effect anyway because the template or edits to it does not grant or remove protection or adjust any page protection which may or may not exist. Thewinchester (talk) 23:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Editing

By now I trust you have received enough warnings and have gained enough experience of how Wikipedia works. Further disruptive edits (such as making inappropriate protection related edits, or creating templates which you claim should only be edited by yourself) will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, I hope you can edit constructively from this point on. Deiz talk 13:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Could you explain what encyclopedic merit the (asserted as self-created) photoshop images you placed on Nissan Urvan hold? Deiz talk 14:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Sockpupeteering

That was stupid! By creating a sockpuppet User:Nissan User you confirmed that you are a sock of the indefinately banned user User:Urvan25. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 10:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block

Given the sockpuppetry and serious editing concerns I've placed a block on your account. Feel free to discuss the block here. Deiz talk 13:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I Will never Place Disruptive Edits Again"

Decline reason: "You are still a sock; see the above section. — Sandstein 06:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.