Talk:Volvo 700 Series
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Obviously the 900 series was mechaniscally similar, and the articles on the 940 and 960 were small so I boldly merged them. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 13:15, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Could the title of this page be changed to reflect that it does include both the 700/900 models?? 163.13.129.145 06:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Whoa, the V90/VCC concept does NOT belong here!! 163.13.129.145 06:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Dude, I found the article easy to read when I last read it a few months ago. Unless it has been screwed by some people subsequently, I can't see why it is confusing to any readers. 72.93.31.83 17:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
I have some of the factory repair manuals. Can I use them as references? I do not know about scanning some of its drawings, but I can add pictures I tookSupremeDalek 18:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC). SupremeDalek 18:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] 745 crashworthiness
Are we sure about those claims on the 745's crashworthiness? (opening paragraphs). The reference links deal with the integrity of the A-pillar, and they seem to be more a discussion on the dangers of a crumple zone car colliding with a more rigid car. Even then, those references aren't good enough to support even that claim.
A look at one reference book I have mentions nothing about this problem with the 745.
[edit] GA Failed
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR): 
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail: [[Image:|15px]]
Its a pretty confusing article, some of the jargon needs to be linked and it needs a thorough copyedit. Full dates need linking, the images need captions and it needs references. What the 940/960/S90/V90 headings doing here? If they're a replacement for some of the 700 series surely they should be in the 900 series article? GA Failed for now. RHB 16:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- There is no 900-series article since the 940 and 960 are based on the 740 and 760. The S/V90 are really late 960 rebadged to fit in with Volvos new naming structure. This is clearly stated in the article. --Dahlis 23:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, the main difference between a late 740/760 and the 940/960 is a new rear end, and a new inline-6 power plant. Incremental changes.
[edit] 700 & 900 title
The title of the article must be changed to Volvo 700 & 900 series as wikipedia has deemed them to be in the same entry, while Volvo badged both cars seperate. So both 700 & 900 must be listed as the articles title if wikipedia is to be true - Anthony. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.143.150 (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please globalise
To read this article, you'd think that the 700 (and 900) series Volvos were barely known outside the US. In fact until recently they were a very common sight here in Britain, and there are still quite a few around. 86.143.51.58 (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] SE Information is really lacking.
There needs to be more information on the Special Editions, as it was more than just a badge difference as portrayed in the article. The SE versions of both the pre-89 and 90+ 740s are heavily sought after by Volvo enthusiasts and collectors. The pre-89s came with what was called the Aero-flow or AirFlow body kit. And in 1991-1992 the 740SE came with painted body styling kits and spoiler which triggered a new incentive to design sportier vehicles like it's successor the 850 T5-R/850R.D3X10N (talk) 06:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

