Talk:Vodacom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An article like this has no business being on Wikipedia - it has zero objectivity.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.54.202.18 (talk • contribs)
- In response to the above sentance? yeah, but how would you like it if your country was been raped by a corporation.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.7.14.236 (talk • contribs)
- Who keeps editing this page to give a glowing reference of Vodacom? Who you working for, huh, huh? Ahhh, Mr Knott-Craig I presume. The simple fact is that Vodacom's excessive prices are hindering South Africa's economy, just like Telkom. No wonder they are in bed with each other! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.46.68.44 (talk • contribs)
- Please stop inserting personal criticisms into this article. True or false (and I have no idea), they have no place in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's official policy on neutral point of view. This is not a soapbox for arguments in favor or against Vodacom's buisness policies. Those belong on your own private web site, blog, etc., but not on Wikipedia. The page is not a "glowing reference"; in fact, I edited it to remove a paragraph of "marketing talk" about being "a pan-African leader in mobile communications" or similar hype. I don't live in SA, have never been there, am not a customer or employee of Vodacom or any related company, just a Wikipedia editor who wants to keep things evenhanded.—Preceding unsigned comment added by MCB (talk • contribs)
- Who keeps editing this page to give a glowing reference of Vodacom? Who you working for, huh, huh? Ahhh, Mr Knott-Craig I presume. The simple fact is that Vodacom's excessive prices are hindering South Africa's economy, just like Telkom. No wonder they are in bed with each other! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.46.68.44 (talk • contribs)
- Fair enough.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.46.68.44 (talk • contribs)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Vodacom logo.jpg
Image:Vodacom logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

