Talk:Virtua Fighter (anime)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the The Sega Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sega products. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within The Sega Project

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Peer review Virtua Fighter (anime) has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

[edit] Sega Project Assessment

Hi. I saw that this article was on the New Requests for assessment at the Sega Project, and as pretty much the only full-time assessor, I'm here to do the assessment on behalf of the department. I'll start by going over what I like in the quality, then what needs improvement, and finally my rating on both quality and importance.

So let's start with what's good:

  • For as short of an articles as this is, it's got several sources, which is good. It could use more, but what article on Wikipedia doesn't?
  • It seems fairly comprehensive, though very short.

Here's what needs improvement:

  • The article's focus on the characters is not good. There's an article on the characters of Virtua Fighter already.
  • All the other sections are far too short and incomprehensive.
  • This article will need a lot of work in order to improve.

It's a very short article without much substance, and for that I have to rate it stub-class, low importance. It will need a lot of work, but hey, that's why I assess articles, to help people find out what they need to do. If you want it assessed again after some work, just repost the request again when you've got the work done. Thanks. Redphoenix526 (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)