Talk:Virgin Missing Adventures

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Doctor Who WikiProject

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Companions?

The table on the Past Doctor Adventures page includes companions. Any particular reason why this one doesn't? (I'll take care of it if there isn't, but I won't bother if there's some reason for the inconsistency.)

Actually, the New Adventures page has publication dates as well. Should this one? —Josiah Rowe 05:39, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

No idea. Go for it. --khaosworks (talkcontribs) 06:33, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

I started both those pages, so you can blame me. :) This one was started first, and I never got round to coming back to this one to add companions. It's quite a lot of work and you seem quite eager… I'll leave it to you now? ;) --TimPope 07:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Done. I'll put companions & publication dates on the other novel pages later. —Josiah Rowe 16:17, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Incidentally, it looks a bit weird to me to have UNIT as a "companion", but that's the way it's listed on several of the books ("featuring the Third Doctor, Liz Shaw and UNIT" or some such). Anyone have a better idea on how to deal with that? (Listing the Brig, Benton & Mike Yates would probably take up too much room.) —Josiah Rowe 20:12, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

I personally don't consider any of the UNIT military personnel as companions, so I wouldn't object to seeing them excised entirely from that column. --khaosworks (talkcontribs) 22:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
I could remove UNIT, or I could change the column to Featuring instead of Companions... —Josiah Rowe 23:56, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
I'm not fussed either way, honestly, as long as the header is accurate. :) --khaosworks (talkcontribs) 01:13, 30 August 2005 (UTC)