Talk:Virgin Megastores

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Business and economics Portal
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Was the Original one on Oxford street as big as it is now?

If Richard Branson started the company as an independant record store, how could he possibly start with the one on Oxford street. It's Huge.--Richy 22:37, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Forgotten, I'd asked that question. I know the answer now. No, it was a smaller one a few doors down.--Richy 23:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Editor 'Not' part of the V Team!

The previous edition completely removed anything that seemed to show the chain in a negative way and revised it with a more 'promotional' edge. It is clear the editor is part of the Virgin family and I have thus re-edited the article from a completely un-biased point of view, complete with necessary researched information obtained from reliable sources.

It's still a totally promotional article. Richardrj 10:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I hope it weren't my edits that you consider promotional as I'm the last editor (dismissing the robot), I've only been dealing with locations of stores in the article. Regards Captain scarlet 10:18, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have made it clearer - the section I object to is the one headed "Product selection", which is pure puffery. Richardrj 12:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Blimmey ! Oh dear, i haven't had a lok at what it was but it still looks very much like advertising now. I might give it a go during the weekend. Regards, Captain scarlet 12:35, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
I work for Virgin in New York, and can tell you that I have no intentions of promoting this piece of shit store. The managers are ass-backward and corrupt and its head office in L.A. couldn't tell sand from dirt. My additions are nothing more than factual--of course I could do what I truely feel I should do and just continuously vandlize the page--but what would that accomplish? Almost Famous 07:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Virgin downloads incompatibility ?

In Virgin Megastore#Virgin vs. the Competition is the following passage:

The download service has faced some criticism from consumer groups due to its in-compatibility with the highly popular iTunes program.

Other than possessing a PoV relating to iTunes, I am somewhat confused at the above statement claiming that virgin's system is not compatible with iTunes. Doesn't iTunes play mp3 files by default ? Are there any sources for the above statement ? 62.6.139.11 14:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Virgin Stores in Canada...

I'm a little confused, Calgary still has a Virgin store in our airport. WestJet 01:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Locations

Wikipedia is not a directory of store locations, nor is it a place for long lists. No other retailer article has a list of the locations of every single one of its outlets. This section should be rewritten in prose form (for example, take a leaf out of the H&M article) or deleted. WindsorFan 15:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zavvi

"Sir Richard Branson has sold his UK chain of Virgin record stores to a group of senior staff at the business. The deal, whose value has not been disclosed, will see Virgin's 125 UK and Irish Megastores rebranded as Zavvi."[1]. violet/riga (t) 12:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


Is it Zavvi or even Zawi? There seems to be two spellings of the name on display of this page--Screen42 09:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

It's Z A V V I —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.189.170 (talk) 10:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Zavvi now has it's own page. TubularWorld 17:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Future of the "Virgin Megastore" name; Zavvi rebranding

Given the news that the "Virgin Megastore" brand name is to disappear from the United Kingdom and Ireland within a couple of months, what are the plans for the brand elsewhere? It appears that only the Japanese stores are still under the control of the Virgin group; does this mean that the Megastores in America, Australia, etc. will shortly have to give up the Virgin name? I think the acquisition and rebranding issue needs some more explanatory text. 217.155.20.163 13:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

It would appear that all of the stores not in the UK and Ire which are currently Virgin Megastores, will remain as Virgin Megastores. The Zavvi deal ONLY concerns the UK/ire stores which the Virgin Group still had.

For example the Virgin Megastores in the USA are still (and will still be called) Virgin Megastores even though the Virgin Group sold these stores in August. This is due to the company which owns the US stores, using the Virgin brand, as a franchise from the Virgin Group. TubularWorld 15:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] VM UK

Does anyone think that there should be a page made for the details on the 'former' UK stores, so that it doesn't conflict with the current international stores?TubularWorld 15:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lanyard.jpg

Image:Lanyard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)