Talk:Violet Trefusis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. |
 |
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. |
[edit] Biography assessment rating comment
WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 17:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Even after my cleanups, I'm demoting it to Start class. The nature of her life is, of course, one of gossip and scandal, but the article has to go farther in neutrality and encyclopedic tone. Not to mention things like references, pictures, infobox, etc. -- Yamara 17:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Spoiler warning? Why is there a spoiler warning for a non-fictional person? Nik42 09:03, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
What's all the bolding for...? AnonMoos 19:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
"Violet and Vita" appear in the title track from Al Stewart's Between the Wars, running "Through the streets of Paris/Their laughter floating through the dark". Asat 21:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Neat! -- Yamara 17:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Major reversion
I reverted this article from the unwikified state I found it in to the version of Aug. 18, 2007, last edited by User:SatyrTN. Work done since that time has been lost, but the old version strikes me as so manifestly superior to the version I happened upon — having references, wikilinks, and other good things that the last version lacked — that I thought it best to simply discard more than a month's work of edits on the bad one. You may proceed to throw rocks and stones at me. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Why on earth does someone having an affair warrant a whole paragraph on wikipedia? It's ludicrous. I move to have the whole thing removed. Get a life, people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.252.153 (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
