Talk:Vincent-Marie Viénot, Count of Vaublanc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

↓    Skip to table of contents    ↓
Vincent-Marie Viénot, Count of Vaublanc is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
October 8, 2007 Featured article candidate Not promoted
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
France Portal
Vincent-Marie Viénot, Count of Vaublanc is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)
Other languages WikiProject Echo has identified Vincent-Marie Viénot, Count of Vaublanc as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the French language Wikipedia.

[edit] Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/September 2007

Made a semi automatic javascript peer review of this article. If it is a FAC it should not also be a good article nominee. As it is at B class - the article should probably have a peer review, then good article nomination, then FAC. Good luck with your article! SriMesh | talk 21:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Good article nominations Good article review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Develop (Expand) lead and address FAC comments b (MoS): Address semi automatic peer reviewer check list of problems as listed above and at FAC.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Again as per notes in FAC b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:
  • Check the what links here page for a possible additional section entitled See also which could provide internal wiki links to articles on this subject.
  • Reduce the amount of red links referred to in the body of the article. - Create these articles yourself, to help this article achieve a higher status.

Good luck with your article! SriMesh | talk 21:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)