Talk:Viasa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Defunct Airlines WikiProject

Viasa is part of WikiProject Venezuela, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Venezuela and Venezuela-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Dear Writer,

I was intrested reading your page on VIASA I need to correct you that VIASA did have a crash near LISBOA Portugal on 30/5/61 DC-8-52 PH-DCL (Aircraft name) "Fridjof Nansen" KLM owned in service for VIASA throgh a wet lease.

Kind regards Willem

• In the article there was no mention of anyone being blamed for the crash. Saying that Viasa was not to blame without any source quoted and whitout any previous POV comment having hinted it was, amounts to a POV comment.
• Stating that rest is mandated by international regulations does address what was being said; "when compared to others" - as all airlines would be subject to the same regulation. Regulations stablished a minimum floor. It is up to each airline and their unions to change it to more if they so negotiate. The new comment did not address the initial comment. --Anagnorisis 17:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)