Talk:VIA Technologies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
VIA, in its generic sense, stands for the 'Virtual Interface Architecture' being promoted By Microsoft, Intel and Compaq. VI is a clustering technology that operates independently of processors, operating systems (like Windows or OS2), and media.
VI Architecture standardizes the interface for high-performance network technologies known as System Area Networks (SANs). Utilizing a SAN, VI Architecture transforms a collection of independent standards-based servers into a highly scalable cluster that can meet the performance and capacity requirements of the largest and most demanding enterprise applications. Its fast server-to-server communications can enhance an application's scalability and performance in a variety of ways from allowing a single application to run efficiently across dozens of clustered nodes, to speeding up the exchange of data between distributed application modules running on different application servers.
Chris Dodd, a Senior Principal Engineer in the Performance Networking Lab in Intel’s Corporate Technology Group, was the principal architect for the Virtual Interface Architecture for SANs, lead architect of the team that developed the system architecture that was the basis for the teraflops system deployed at Sandia National Laboratory and technical lead and manager of the Next Generation I/O architecture group (the precursor of InfiniBand* Architecture).
One of VIA's key efficiencies is to enable smooth interfacing of general-purpose computers to high-speed switched networks, a long-stnading problem. This is set out in Intel Press's book "The Virtual Interface Architecture" Chapter 1 of Intel's book "The Virtual Interface Architecture"
- That's fine, but this page is about the chipset maker. Are you sure you meant to put this here? -lee 07:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
This articles ending reads like an advertisement it reaks of POV
Until you sign your user name, or state what exactly is POV, I'm removing the tag. Give specifics - just moaning is not enough for me to take you seriously. I've seen this before on the NVIDIA pages, when people insisted we write a corproate history of NVIDA without talking about the GeForce line of products. Stop me while I fall about laughing........Timharwoodx 18:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC) - ON BEHALF OF VIA TECH PR DEPARTMENT
[edit] S3 joint venture partner?
Who is the partner of VIA in the S3 JV? Alinor 12:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Via-logo.gif
Image:Via-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No proof VIA is associated with Formosa Plastics Group
I searched everywhere for the connection, and the only source I found was [1]. But the funny thing it is that I cannot be sure that this information is true because I couldnt find it neither at Via site: [2] nor at Formosa Plastics Group site [3] I guess what happened it is that someone looked at the information on that page and just copied elsewhere, on news sites and now on wikipedia. Daniel de França (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

