User talk:VGoldoni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent VGoldoni (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

Hey Tojo, good to see you haven't given up yet. Your work on dopamine was reasonable. With regards to the epidemiology content you removed on Parkinson's disease, please have another try at discussing the changes openly on the talk page before riding roughshod through established content. Simply shouting "no evidence" in an edit summary is not helpful. Perhaps the evidence exists but is hard to find. Rather, support every point you make with accessible references. JFW | T@lk 21:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "no factual basis, banned solely after adding one referenced fact and eliminating superfluous wording"

Decline reason: "Your unblock request does not provide reason to believe you are not a sockpuppet. -- Yamla 22:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "in order to justify the ban it says "see contributions for evidence". There is no evidence. There is nothing to respond to. There is nothing to prove wrong. The banning took place quite arbitrarily, solely after adding one referenced fact and eliminating superfluous wording. That is not evidence that justifies banning. If it did, nearly everyone on Wikipedia would be banned. Blocking to gain an advantage in a content dispute is strictly prohibited. The contributions prove that the two administrators involved have been frequent editors of the article in question, and are involved are constantly blocking and reverting almost everyone. One of them, Chris73 added all of the pictures, and reverts or blocks anyone that tries to remove them. Jfdwolff has been editing the article longer than anyone and blocks and reverts anyone that is not an ally that tries to rever what he has added. Administrators that have a vested interest in the article should not be able to abuse the process by blocking or reverting at will in order to maintain their edits."

Decline reason: "Your unusual knowledge of the supposed longterm history of two editors' contributions fits with your being a sockpuppet of someone. -- Sandstein 21:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.