Talk:Versioning file system
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So why is there no modern versioning file system, or is there? It always seemed like a nice feature to me when using VMS back in the stone age. Spalding 12:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Vista does support it, and Norton GoBack also as an addon to Window$. This is indeed a great feature and I don't know why isn't it more widespread doc Aberdeen ❖ 01:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
What about "mod_dav_svn"? It is sort of an adapter between the versioning system Subversion and WebDAV. WebDAV in turn is a network protocol for filesystem access, and I guess it can even be mounted as ordinary filesystem in some operating systems. Altogether this solution might be concidered a modern versioning file system. Can someone verify this, and change the article accordingly? Michael R. 14:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NTFS
What about NTFS's versioning through file's alternate datastreams? Shouldn't it be considered as a kind of versioning file system?
- I mentioned NTFS, although It would be surprising if it was done via alternate streams. (Doc aberdeen 00:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC))
- Surprisingly enough, it is. AND it doesn't show up on the file size (which is just the size of the unnamed stream) or on the directory size.
- Ummmm, no it isn't. NTFS does not keep versions of the files that it manages. The closest thing that some Windows boxes have for versioning is Shadow Copies, and that uses a separate cache file (or hardware), and not alternate datastreams. If you're talking about the "Version" tab of the File->Properties dialog in Explorer, please realize that that has nothing to do with Versioning File Systems.
- Surprisingly enough, it is. AND it doesn't show up on the file size (which is just the size of the unnamed stream) or on the directory size.
[edit] TOPS20
I'm fairly certain that the file system used in ITS, which started development on the PDP-6, is far older than TOPS20. It's a bit of an oddity, though, since it don't have to be a versioning file system, but can be if you give your files a number (which will then be incremented automatically). Does that feature disqualify ITS? Otherwise I suggest it was the oldest file system with versioning, unless someone can tell us that WAITS or some other oddity was earlier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.15.24.166 (talk) 22:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Removing information
I am removing information related to the following:
It says in their descriptions that they are not versioning file systems, so they are not relevant to the article. Gh5046 (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

