Talk:Vermont Route 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Vermont Route 17 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
March 16, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics New York State routes Vermont Routes
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.

[edit] GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): - Updated:  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)) b (MoS): - Updated:  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • distance in 2nd para of History needs to have a convert.Y Done
  • "The road was paved between 1936 and 1940" - so the pavement was removed after 1940? Please clear up Y Done
  • Lets use {{jct}} in the infobox to keep consistency with the junction list Y Done
  • Bold in the history section? Y Done
    • VT F-7 redirects here, thus I have restored the boldface for it. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Works for me - I'll note that for future reviews.  — master sonT - C 23:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • The route description does not detail anything about the NY 910L portion. Since this article focuses partly on it - perhaps there should be some detail in there.Y Done
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Can we get a map of the route? (not binding to the review) Y Done
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: - Updated:  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
    Overall its very good, just these few fixes and we're ready to go, holding until then

 — master sonT - C 19:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Updated - passed congratulations  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)