Talk:Vendange tardive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wine WikiProject Vendange tardive is part of WikiProject Wine, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of wines, grapes, wine producers and wine growing regions. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page where you can join the project and find other ways of helping.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale within WikiProject Wine.
It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.
Vendange tardive is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)

[edit] Mergers

I've removed the merge to Alsace wine tag, as VT does get used in other regions of France (and I think in Luxembourg too). I can see an argument for merging into dessert wine but I think there's now enough of it to stand alone. Plus it's the sort of thing that you will want to link to in its own right; there's an analogy with Beerenauslese there. By the same token, I haven't started a separate article on SGN - it is probably enough to create a redirect here?FlagSteward 20:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Misc

Anyone got a link to the original of Hugel's Law?

I'm not sure why Wnissen thinks that VT's are 'normally' dry table wines - I've had quite a few, and the only ones that were even getting close to 'dry' were some of the Trimbach ones, but they are the exception rather than the rule, and I would still put them at Spatlese rather than 'dry'.

I've at least one label kicking around, I'll mebbe get round to scanning it some time. FlagSteward 20:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits by User:213.114.34.95

I see 213.114.34.95 has reduced the target percentages required under Hugel's Law. Given that I referenced them from a Hugel document written after the changes in 2001, I believe they should be correct - are you sure that you're not using the pre-2001 values? Unless you can come up with references within a couple of days, I'll revert your changes. FlagSteward 20:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Reverted FlagSteward 10:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)