Talk:Venango County, Pennsylvania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Venango County, Pennsylvania article.

Article policies
Venango County, Pennsylvania is part of WikiProject Pennsylvania, which is building a comprehensive and detailed guide to Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

[edit] Pittsburgh?

This county isn't even part of the

Venango County, Pennsylvania is part of WikiProject Pittsburgh, which is building a comprehensive guide to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project.

Editors are currently needed to tag Pittsburgh-related articles with {{pghproj}}.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

. I don't think we should use Ad companies definitions of geo-political boundaries. Is there any other county description that does this? I'm not aware of any. If no response in 7 days I'll change it.Tstrobaugh 21:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you are talking about? --Chris Griswold () 21:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, it was obvious to me, it's the lead sentence "Venango County is a county located in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania and is part of the Pittsburgh DMA." what does this have to do with Venango Counnty? Even if there is some connection (I do not consider an Ad company to be a reliable source) should it be the lead sentence?Tstrobaugh 22:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
You're right, it should go, and I have removed it. Not sure when or why it was added. I must have skipped over the mention of Pittsburgh when I searched for it before responding because I couldn't have imagined it would be in the first sentence. --Chris Griswold () 23:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)