User talk:Vascul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] License tagging for Image:L. Gundappa.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:L. Gundappa.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requesting Comments / RFC

Hi, you recently made a request on Wikipedia:Requests for comment that:

Revision of contents of Bio - L. Gundappa

Dear editors,

Please review the edited article on L. Gundappa. It has been recast to be neutral in tone. Additionally, any of the writers in Kannada language already featured in Wikipedia such as U.R. Anathamurthy and Nissar Ahmed can vouch for Mr. L. gundappa's contrubutions, if you want other points of view.

Sincerely, V. Culleton.

Please note that that is the wrong page to request comments on an article. If you wish to request comments on an article, insert an RFCxxx template in the discussion page of the article concerned. I think that what you actually want to do is insert an RFCbio on Talk:L. Gundappa. Please se the instructions at WP:RFC#Instructions, and the following examples and notes may also be helpful.


Hi, an RFC request you added to WP:RFC was incorrectly formatted, and wasn't processed by the RFC bot. Please see RFC Instructions for information on selecting and filling out RFCxxx templates. The example and notes below may also be of use.

Example use of RFCxxx template

This example shows how a partially completed RFCxxx template might appear in an edit box before the section and reason parameters have been completed (xxx = any of bio, econ, hist, lang, sci, art, pol, reli, soc, style, policy).

{{ RFCxxx | section = !! reason = !! time = ~~~~~ }}

This example shows how a completed RFCxxx template and associated section heading might appear in a discussion page edit box before saving.

== RFC: Is photo in "history" section relevant to article? ==

{{ RFCxxx | section = RFC: Is photo in "history" section relevant to article? !! reason = Is the photograph in the "History" section relevant to the article? !! time = ~~~~~ }}

Is the photograph in the "History" section relevant to the article?

Things to note:

  • RFCxxx templates go on discussion pages, not in articles.
  • Only one section containing RFCxxx templates should exist in a discussion page, and it may only contain one of each type of RFCxxx template, otherwise RFC bot will get confused.
  • All parameters in the template must be completed (section, reason, and time).
  • section is the section header of the discussion document section that the RFCxxx template is inserted in, RFC bot uses this information to insert a link in the RFCxxx list that points to the discussion.
  • reason is a neutral statement of the reason than an RfC is requested for. RFC bot copies it to the RFCxxx list. It should be repeated after the template.
  • time is a standard timestamp as provided by using 5 tilde characters ~~~~~.
  • Do Not use any exclamation mark ( ! ) characters in your reason or section, they will confuse RFC bot.

I hope this helps. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 18:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)