Talk:Vapor Trails

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

149.166.112.178 added "Tom's review" in April 2004. Who is Tom? I have to wonder if this has been copied from another website without permission? RedWolf 20:02, May 15, 2004 (UTC)

A page on about.com (http://experts.about.com/e/v/va/vapor_trails.htm) seems to be a straight copy-paste from here. Not even a good copy-paste job. I'm confident that this Wikipedia article is the original. SandyFace 23:43, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Major Arcana

0 The Fool I The Magician II The High Priestess III The Empress IV The Emperor V The Pope VI The Lovers VII The Chariot VIII Justice IX The Hermit X Wheel of Fortune XI Strength XII The Hanged Man XIII Death XIV Temperance XV The Devil XVI The Tower XVII The Star XVIII The Moon XIX The Sun XX Judgement XXI The World

Minor Arcana

The Suit of Wands Ace Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten Page Knight Queen King

The Suit of Coins Ace Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten Page Knight Queen King

The Suit of Swords Ace Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten Page Knight Queen King

The Suit of Cups Ace Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten Page Knight Queen King

I wrote myself a section about the tarot cards in the booklet of the album.201.19.193.202 13:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prorec link

It's been down for a long time and Rip Rowan's article on the problems with "Vapor Trails" is a great analysis. Fortunately, there's a cached version of the page:

http://web.archive.org/web/20060423231848/http://www.prorec.com/prorec/articles.nsf/articles/8A133F52D0FD71AB86256C2E005DAF1C

--Alvabass 17:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Genre category

I am opening up this discussion in the hopes that consensus can be reached on this topic - I'd like to avoid any heated editing "oscillations" since they are counterproductive and altogether frustrating. It is essentially a violation of WP:NOR to insist upon changing the info box to reflect your opinion on what genre Vapor Trails falls under, especially with the only reason given being "time signature changes". Many rock songs display irregular or shifting time signatures - it's a rather indefensible reason. Rush has not belonged to the progressive rock genre for some time now. Wisdom89 23:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Hard rock covers it well enough. Any other genres added are just superfluity....or just plain false(like Prog metal). As mentioned...Rush hasn't been "prog" for many years. 156.34.232.31 23:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I support it being Hard Rock. In fact, I seem to remember articles about the change in producers to someone who could give a more 'hard' sound, and a less 'prog' sound. ThuranX 01:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)