Image talk:Valencia.jpg

The result of the debate was delete, replaceable. —Angr 07:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

This is a photo for media purposes and there are no photos with the same representation of Valencia that are more 'free'. Acidskater 18:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

A free image could be created, however. Whether one currently exists is irrelevant. —Chowbok ☠ 18:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

It would be hard to create a free image with the same representation. Btw, if your going to go through hundreds of pictures saying there can be a free image created, have one yourself. I've read a lot about your edits and proposed deletions and you have angered a whole lot of people and for no reason. You seem to have some power trip going on with all of this and I think you need to chill out with it. Acidskater 18:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I wanted to reword my first sentence, a free image could not be reasonably created with the same representation. [1] Acidskater 18:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Please, assume good faith. Darkly speculating about my motives is unseemly and counterproductive. It is possible for people to disagree with you and still have good intentions. —Chowbok ☠ 03:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

See also Image talk:Wheatus 2005.jpg. --Oden 02:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Chowbok is right, this is not the place to discuss a editor's contributions. Concentrate on discussing the image in question. --Oden 03:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

How does one tell if there has been an effort to find an adequate freely licensed replacement? I have searched since Chowbok first tagged the image and have yet to find a freely licensed replacement adequate enough. Acidskater 07:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.