Talk:Vadim Zeeland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Notability?

I wonder what the purpose is of an article that contains the phrase "little is known about <subject>". If little is known, then is there really any point in having the article? (A personal view, I admit, but something about that Biography section suggests someone making a conscious attempt to create an air of mystery - which is not something an encyclopaedia is supposed to do.)

Still, the article makes one claim alone for Vadim Zeeland - that he developed 'reality tranferring' (sic). But it does not indicate what 'reality transferring' (presumably) is, how it works, or what contribution it makes to our understanding of reality. There is no corresponding article for 'reality transferring'. A Google search reveals only 165 matches - many of which draw from this article down to the typo in 'transferring', and presumably feed from Wikipedia automatically.

In short, the article tells us nothing. Unless someone can come up with some viable (and citable) information on this person, I suggest the article be considered for deletion. - Shrivenzale (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)