User talk:Ustyuzhanin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 20:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or a place for your speculate on the future popularity of something. If and when it becomes less popular to the point that it was considered a fad, that catagory can be added. You may also want to have a look at WP:V and WP:NPOV.--Crossmr 00:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Crossmr 16:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The status of whether or not yoga is considered a fad has no bearing on whether or not Livejournal is a fad. It does not meet the definition and you haven't provided reliable sources to show its a fad. Continuing to label it a fad is a violation of WP:NPOV and per Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence you are required to provide proof that Livejournal is a fad before you can label it as such. Both of these policies are non-negotiable cornerstones of wikipedia. There is a discussion on the talk page. If you have a comment to make, make it there.--Crossmr 16:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)