Talk:USS Parche (SSN-683)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Parche (SSN-683) article.

Article policies
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale
Mid rated as Mid-importance on the assessment scale
Maintenance This article has a deprecated, subst'ed or incorrect infobox and needs a new one.
Please replace with {{Infobox Ship Begin/doc}}

[edit] Grapples?

In Blind Man's Bluff, the Parche did undertake missions that require saturation divers, and I did not recall any mention that it had a grapple that can collect objects off the seabed. They had the "fish", like the ones on the Halibut, which was capable of seeing and diving into very deep depths, but that's basically it. Calyth 07:29, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Was Blind Man's Bluff ever confirmed by the US Navy as anything more than a collective gathering of rumours and theories that had been printed in various newspaper articles?????? I'm just checking to see if it can be used as a reference as every government agency involved in the book denies that it is.--Joseph Robert 07:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I removed "grapples" from the body of the text as there is no supporting references to them. The item the was removed is as follows: ", as well as a remotely controlled grapple that could be lowered through a hatch in the boat's keel to retrieve objects from the ocean floor." Figured I'd put it here so it is not lost in case another source becomes available.Joseph Robert (talk) 10:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)