Talk:USA Next
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] NPOV?
I have my doubts about the neutrality of this article, as I see a section full of negative commentary labeled "Criticism", but no similar section for positive commentary. Is there no positive commentary on this organization, or rebuttal of the negative, even from its own sources? F117-A 05:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. This is one of the most blatantly non-NPOV articles I've seen on WikiPedia that has not been officially challenged. How does one go about having this thing "branded" as "non-neutral?" B. Polhemus 18:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
This article is not balanced. I would like to see information from other sources, as well as the pros of this organization. There is more than one point of view on all things.Whozis (talk) 20:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I agree. Adding a NPOV template now. --Anoma lee (talk) 11:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. The AARP is a very powerful, politically liberal organization that could be threatened if USA Next were allowed to grow. It would not be surprising to see every attempt made to stop it.
Unfortunately I think AARP has apparently won, as attempts to open the USA Next webpage are now met with Invalid Host, and email to their previous address is not being answered. Some of us will now have to search for another alternative to the AARP's liberal lobby organization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassayampa Slim (talk • contribs) 22:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
