Talk:Unwritten (song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Citation for lyric change
If anyone's interested, [link to copyvio website removed] -anabus_maximus (Talk to me) 03:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- "Unwritten" is not a US Pop #1 hit. The "Pop 100" is not the US's main "pop chart", despite the name. That chart is the Hot 100, whose current number-one is Temperature by Sean Paul. --FuriousFreddy 02:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- The song, however, did reach number one on the Pop 100 for the week published April 8, 2006. —Eternal Equinox | talk 21:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- I know. Hence my above comment. --FuriousFreddy 02:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand what you had meant to intrepert. —Eternal Equinox | talk 03:23, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- I know. Hence my above comment. --FuriousFreddy 02:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- The song, however, did reach number one on the Pop 100 for the week published April 8, 2006. —Eternal Equinox | talk 21:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wet warbly sound?
"The song has a wet warbly sound at the end due to her allowing saliva to collect in her mouth for the entire duration of the song." .. this is a joke, right? Coop 08:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- No, it has been noted that this is the only song where she allows saliva to collect in her mouth throughout the song (probably due to there not being enough time to swallow saliva during "breathing" parts), this is probably the case since there is a wet, slightly warbly sound in parts at the end. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.72.202.222 (talk) 20:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC).
- Thanks for replying, but I'd still want to see a citation on this. To me it doesn't make any sense since the vocals are multi-tracked and likely made in several takes. The transition from the gospelly bit near the end demonstrates some sort of switch. Coop 14:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll admit the "wet, warbly sound" is absent in all studio recordings, but in all live performances she barely has the time to breathe and she has to keep her head tilted back towards the end to apparently avoid saliva spilling out.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.62.254 (talk • contribs)
- Thanks for replying, but I'd still want to see a citation on this. To me it doesn't make any sense since the vocals are multi-tracked and likely made in several takes. The transition from the gospelly bit near the end demonstrates some sort of switch. Coop 14:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
No-one seems to have mentioned that the song is tedious, dull and a waste of everyone's time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.74.230 (talk) 06:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

