User talk:Universal Hero/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Universal Hero! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yea!

Sivaji certified a U. Also I have over 6k edits. ~~ AVTN T CV A 16:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Request

Hi Hero,

Recently I have also started writting articles on wikipedia, Bu t i don;t know how my article still doesn't show results on Google...Or even the links are not available on wiki.

I have created article on Anil Mehta. Please suggest. Myu email Id is Removed e-mail!

Thanks, Nitin

Please use the e-mail button to contact UH, and he knows your e-mail know. He is intelligent enough to know how to find it. ~~ AVTN T CV A 18:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do you search my contributions?

You always seem to know when I have created a new article. Also you NEVER answer me... ~~ AVTN T CV A 18:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ambiguous link

Your recent edit to Madurai Veeran (film) included one or more links to the page Tamil, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to Madurai Veeran (film) to refer directly to the most relevant topic. (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. RussBot 18:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sivaji: The Boss

Although I don't normally review or help other articles, I will give you some pointers to get it to GA status.

  • As it is a premature film, it can't be nominated. Nominate it again about 3 months after its release (about August)(you might want it to go to GA now, but be patient.
  • In my opinion, for a film that hasn't been released, the article is too long. 72000kb, considering you have to add a plot section, a release and response + dvd sections, it'll be too long.
    • Try trimming down the section "Soundtrack" into about three paragraphs. It already has a main article which all that information should be there. (1 para on production, 1 para on unoffical to official versions and 1 para on release and response)
  • You have extra spacing between the two paragraphs in the LEAD, this should be just one line.
    • For an article this size, the lead should be longer, see WP:LEAD
  • You have a casting section, but you might want to add a cast list (similar to Casino Royale (2006 film) or Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith). You then might want to trim the Casting section to only main actors/actresses
  • Remove the wikinews box in the Publicity and Release section, (either remove it or put it down with external links
  • In the references section there is a link at the top, remove it or put it in external links.
  • In the opening infobox, you don't need the release of the soundtrack in the released part.
  • It is cited but you may have cited incorrectly. (I havent checked it)
    • For news articles use {{cite news}}
    • For web pages with info use {{cite web}}
      • I'm not going to check that but it seems all the references are all the same.
        • Reference One is a prime example, to use {{cite news}} over {{cite web}}
  • In my opinion you should have the article copy edited, (this is a check for spelling, updating prose etc.). Some of the prose on the article is not good (eg. After the release of the surprise hit, Kadhalan in 1994, directed by Shankar he answered when interviewed by Sun TV,[4] that his official aim was to direct South India's two major actors, Kamal Haasan and Rajinikanth. (doesn't really make sense)).
  • The category's need to be sorted aphebettically (numbers then letters)(ignore automated categorys eg. Upcoming films)


SpecialWindler 07:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Yo, UH I'll help out with the job. ~~ AVTN T CV A 18:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I think that problems have arisen in Sivaji: The Boss

And also AVM want to release it with less pressure. They can only make 40 reels per day, they need to make 700+(just for india). ~~ AVTN T CV A 10:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rajinikanth and Sivaji: The Boss statistics!

[edit] Sivaji: The Boss trailer is OUT!

http://www.ayngaran.com/Ayngaran/Ayngaran_Home.html?id=trailer&name=Shivaji ~~ AVTN T CV A 18:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

This is pretty close to the trailor out on galatta.com , I am part of the rajinifans.com newsgroup and I got a link to the trailer and the username/password to access it. Since galatta are the official site owners I think that is legit. If you want I can link to galatta. ~~ AVTN T CV A 18:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Laying low eh...

Well, I'll be back on the 25th of June. After which I will be doing some work until the 17th of June on wikipedia. Then I'm on holiday to India from then. Afterwhich I will review my life. ~~ AVTN T CV A 19:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Its a secret. :P ~~ AVTN T CV A 20:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Career choice. ~~ AVTN T CV A 21:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, I don't know how long I'll stay. By the way do you have facebook? ~~ AVTN T CV A 21:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rajinikanth's political thoughts...

I've seen the trailer over 100 times now, and no I'm not crazy. He says that he won't leave until he does something good for his people. He wants to turn Tamil Nadu into America (like in Bailekka where it says "Annan vanda Tamil Nadu America"). I really think and HOPE that this means that the thailavar is thinking of going to politics. He is doing what MGR did, MGR was 56 if i remember correctly when he acted the "high budget" film of his time called Ullagam Sutrum Valleban where he when to "exotic" places such as Japan and China (which had never been done by Tamil cinema til then). Soon after this film he went into politics. Rajinikanth is 57 now (or will be this year), I think he might be going down that route too. I can't wait to see the film, I just want to know if the thalaivar is the next CM. It is perfect timing, as there is a media war within the Karananadi family, and AVM poured petrol on the flames by selling Sivaji TV rights not to Sun TV but to Karunanidi's other wife's children. Also since he has got in a way "Karunanidi's support", he no longer has the political problems that he faced in Baba due to Karunanidi. Also I feel Rajinikanth has tackled all sides of opposition since he even talks about the Cauvery River in the soundtrack, and days before the release of the soundtrack Simbu's father was screaming about Rajini forgetting it. ~~ AVTN T CV A 21:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sivaji Google Trends.

Sivaji Rajinikanth ~~ AVTN T CV A 11:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:SiovajiW1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SiovajiW1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sivaji story

Check out the synopsis here, if you don't want it spoiled don't check. [2] ~~ AVTN T CV A 18:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Well I doubt the cinema that is airing the film would be lieing, they can get sued for that. They have probably sent the film to the BBFC already, and it is getting certified very soon. ~~ AVTN T CV A 19:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
According to the synopsis Prakash Raj is in the film, but from the trailers he is not. I am feeling maybe it could be a sort of joke by Ayngaran International? ~~ AVTN T CV A 19:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sivaji 12A in the UK!

YES! I booked the tickets for 6PM on the 14th of June! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AVTN (talk • contribs)

So you gonna see the film? ~~ AVTN T CV A 20:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Why so late?
By the way I'm watching Mozhi right now, nice film its touching.~~ AVTN T CV A 17:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I have 2 exams on the morning of the first show and 7 exams on the week after!

Exams aren't an excuse. Go see it on the first day. The crowd will be AMAZING. I've been looking at the Rajinifans Yahoo group and all the stills in India. So far all the tickets up to the 23 are booked in Chennai, the 15th to 17th tickets were sold within seconds of the ticket office opening. US Sivaji tickets are also sold out for the first weekend. North England tickets are sold out until Tuesday, they are opening up multiple screens to allow more tickets to be sold. I would assume that is the same for London Cineworlds. This is a ONCE IN A LIFETIME opportunity.

~~ AVTN T CV A 19:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cineworld ilford ruined the movie!

The sound sucked. Only the front speakers were on and there was no bass.

But the movie was 10/10 nonetheless. I am going to watch it again in Harrow Safari or a different NON-cineworld cinema next week. Thalaivar is the best!

I got all my answers to what I should do from the film!

AVTN 14:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Yea I won't forget the article. But have you seen the film? (PS: WTF my sig won't work. It is limited and won't allow html span tags for adding colour...)AVTN 15:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't think another Sivaji can come for another 20 years. AVTN 15:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Sivaji: The Boss

Hi! Sorry if I offended you in anyway. However, I had noticed that the article was too voluminous. It contains too much of speculated, rumoured information. I was simply trying to go by the guidelines posted in the talk page of the article. I'm really sorry if any of my edits were out of place.

These were a few pointers that I was trying to focus on:

  • Copyediting, style and grammar - some of the sentences were overtly long and difficult to understand.
  • I created the listing for the cast since it was suggested on the talk page (I checked out the article for Casino Royale and tried to model it after that - but since I knew nothing about the roles played by the various actors, I assumed that if I made the simple list, then others could expand each actor's bit :) )
  • Reducing the soundtrack section to the suggested three paragraphs (wasn't able to complete this though :D )
  • Removing content which was irrelevant to the nature of the movie

From my point of view (and in my defense) I really was only trying to help reduce the size of the article. Maybe if we move all the rumours, speculation and other issues related to the movie to a separate article - that might help, then?

Once again I'm sincerely sorry. Just didn't realise that my edits were harmful. Please feel free to reply to me on my talk page. I will refrain from editing the Sivaji article page until we come to an agreement on the edits that I've done. --- aJCfreak yAk 17:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

PS: I'm actually gonna be logging out sometime soon. If necessary, I wouldn't mind discussing each paragraph with you and coming to a consensus - tomorrow.

Ummm. Was just going through the reverts that you've done and realised that you've not "blanket" reverted all my edits. Thanks. Secondly, just realised that I made my last edit AFTER all your reverts and your warning. This was a freak case cos I'd left the editing page open and had gone to get dinner, within which time you'd edited the article and left the message on my talk page. Please revert the last edit, if necessary. I'd be happier if we could discuss the changes required to cleanup the article across talk pages and reach a consensus to work together. Anyways, it's your call now. Happy wiki-ing, all the same! aJCfreak yAk 18:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
So sorry to bother you again, but I just thought I'd let you know that I'm trying to get the Image:73417053 9cf7fb3494 o.jpg image renamed and tagged with the appropriate license. aJCfreak yAk 18:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi again

Since the Sivaji article is in my watchlist, I couldn't help but notice that all of the images in the article have been removed stating that they violate copyrights. I've already included the necessary fair-use tags and the sources to Image:2005112908090201.jpg and Image:Sivaji firstday.jpg.
If you could simply add the source (and change the fair-use template to the correct one, if necessary) to the following images, then we could re-include the images to the article. Else, the images will be deleted pretty soon.

  1. Image:Sivajimusicshop.jpg
  2. Image:Sivajibald.jpg
  3. Image:Rajinikanth_kamalhaasan.jpg
  4. Image:Sivaji-05.jpg

I could do it myself, but I do not know the source from where you/AVTN obtained the images.

If required, please check out copyright tags and the image use policy for complete information what tags to use and the like. Sure hope we can settle these images so that we could include them in the article again. -- aJCfreak yAk 07:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the recent edits to the article, I really feel that the editors are trying to add value to the article. If we look at the whole article from an objective POV, (and also considering that we want the article to get a GA rating, if not an FA in the not-too-distant future) some of their edits were necessary. The points that really stand out are:
  1. Reliable sources for references. According to WP guidelines, we can't use blogs and we definitely can't use YT videos. We need to work on that.
  2. Copyediting, style and grammar. Seriously, we need to majorly work on this bit - else the article will get only a B-rating when we nominate it for peer review.
  3. Lengthy. The article is too long. I know that we have a LOT of info about the movie that we could include in the article, but if we could tone it down to only what is necessary and keeping in tone with the movie, then I believe we could reduce the size. Also, we might discuss the possibility of splitting the whole thing into smaller articles.

Finally, I'm slightly confused by the two messages you left on my talk page (the second one replacing the first). You first mentioned that you're not happy with what I did with the photos. Please lemme know what exactly I did wrong. All I remember is trying to re-align the pictures in the article according to Wikipedia's Image usage guidelines. I also renamed a photo and tagged it with the appropriate licensing/sourcing information.
You've then replaced that message saying we need to stop them. Does this mean that I can be involved with the Sivaji project again? Please let me know. I won't touch the page until you're completely happy with my intentions/edits/explanations. Till then, happy Wiki-ing! aJCfreak yAk 11:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sivaji: The Boss

I don't believe there were mass changes being made to the page. Please read WP:OWN. People are going to be edit the article, so your best bet is to discuss on the talk page if you think someone is making an incorrect edit. Please don't just revert everyone's additions, and then re-insert them manually, since that is just wasting time. Also, it seems like you added back all the changes I had initially made to the article. Thanks, and keep up the good work on the article. Nishkid64 (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Please discuss the referencing situation at Talk:Sivaji: The Boss#Fight over references. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 23:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Plot

I think we should wait since many indians view the article and many haven't seen the film yet in Tamil Nadu. I am part of the Rajini e-fans association and they have put a rule on thier group not to talk about the plot until 1 week after the release. So I think we should wait til thursday. Besides I am seeing the film again next wednesday and the saturday after that. AVTN 08:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gonna delete my account in a few months.

Well, it was fun. I'll tell you why one day (2008). I enjoyed making a massive amount of edits and helping the community and all. AVTN 14:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

I probably won't use wikipedia to edit pages after July 2007. Don't worry I will come to talk to you and stuff. I am getting a name change in preparation for my Right to Vanish! AVTN 15:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sivaji: The Boss GA

See [3]. It's the wrong place, and I don't think it's ready yet. The reason why it failed last time was because it is unstable. It still is, and we also need to work on the plot before submitting a GAC. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:2005112908090201.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2005112908090201.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 21:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Sivajispianshoot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sivajispianshoot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sivaji-05.jpg

Look here: User talk:AVTN#Image_tagging_for_Image:Sivaji-05.jpg

You need to update your tag for Image:Sivaji-05.jpg!

AVTN 12:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sivaji (film) has undergone lots of changes!

Come check it out and see if you need to do a bit. Check the talk page for the to do list, ~~ AVTN Talk 11:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Balleilakka

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Balleilakka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN Talk 11:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Style (2007 song)

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Style (2007 song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN Talk 11:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vaaji Vaaji

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Vaaji Vaaji, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN Talk 11:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sahana (song)

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Sahana (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN Talk 11:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sahara (song)

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Sahara (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN Talk 11:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi again!

Hey, dunno whether you've noticed, but quite a few changes have been made to the Sivaji article. AVTN has even started a news template going to post on talk pages of valuable and major contributors such as yourself. I'm posting the template here:

User:AVTN/Sivaji

The template will keep updating with the news as and when stuff happens with the article. News items can be added by simply clicking the edit link in the template's title bar. Happy Wiki-ing!!! aJCfreak yAk 13:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Fixed the template... ~~ AVTN Talk 15:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Songs?

Well, if you think so. But the song articles are VERY bad. >_>

You should do some work on them. ~~ AVTN Talk 17:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] All I did was summarize the soundtrack section.

And do some proding, I only proded it since I thought you might want it. aJCfreak agreed.

  • Discussions are made on the talk page before major changes
I agree, I have spoken of all my changed on the talk page.
  • People accept that Behindwoods.com is actually a fair source and official - sponsoring many tamil films.
I didn't say it wasn't a fair source. Its just the others thought it wasn't.
  • The unneeded tags on the article are removed
Was by that new guy User: Sarvagnya.
  • Anonymous/new editora re restricted from editing.
Just revert them.

I really think we need to take this issue to tha Wikipedia council or something. The place where they solve issues. ~~ AVTN Talk 18:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

HEY, Don't forget I put a lot of work, not as much as you, but still a lot into that article.~~ AVTN Talk 18:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I really do think we need to take this up to the council or Wikipedia or whatever its called. AND YOU NEED TO ARCHIVE this talk page. ~~ AVTN Talk 18:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)